Hi,

After a long time I am entering the blog space. This time i am going to talk about the so called free energy and alternative science subjects. Now a days it looks like it is fashion to discuss about these things.

So I felt I too should join the band wagon for the sake of being with the "IN thing".

Here goes my musings.

Is it true that the law of conservation of energy is not correct?

No.

In this space/ universe with all the dimensions including the so called time dimensions, everything is energy. When we say energy it refers to all forms of energy including the life energy and matter and everything. This implies that energy exists in various forms one of the form is matter. Matter is always associated with life energy. does it mean that even rocks have life? I can say for sure that yes rocks have life. but it is in such a way that we rare not in a receptive position to realize and communicate with this form of life energy.

So the known forms of energy that is the forms of energy we have no arguments to accept as energy like chemical, potential, thermal and electric energy are nothing but manifestation of the energy universe. As it is accepted that the whole universe is duel in nature in any given dimension of time, I can confidently stipulate that all these active forms of energy has dormant counter part. I imply that there has to be dormant energy all around us which under certain circumstances transforms in to active energy.

So when a system delivers more in output than input it is not over unity. it is that it transforms some unknown energy form in to usable form. since everything is energy, it implies that energy can neither be created nor destroyed.

What does that implies? It implies that one can get the so called usable energy by transforming any other form of energy. this is what Victor, Reich, Tesla, Keely Morey, Hutchinson and all others have done.

Then the question arises how we do that?

We have standing example. "THE NATURE"

As Victor has pointed out the trot fish seemingly swims against very strong currents and also up the water falls with so much energy which as it is the fish is not able to generate itself. In other words we can say in reality it is not after all required to spend so much energy for the fish to travel upstream!

But from our physical calculations of force and following all the laws the action requires so much energy!

which one is true?

We can say the fish ought to be right because it does the work in real and not by way of formulas in paper.

This is not my original thought but the thought of victor who devised so many methods to emulate the same action to accomplish a given task.

After going through all the data as available on the net, I deduce that the seemingly more work is being done not by swirling of the medium in which the work is being done and instead because of the vortex ring that has been formed due to swriling of the medium.

The vortex rings that we form by smoke through the mouth can clearly demonstrate that when we try to blow second smoke ring through the first smoke ring the second ring will move faster than the first ring. it is the same principle that brings down helicopters by stalling.

I believe this is the key to least effort energy.

We can device whole lot of systems to deliver so called usable energy by generating vortex rings.

enough for the day see u later again on the subject.